Article "Tournoi de tennis de Boston (dames 1961)" in French Wikipedia has 10.5 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 1 references and 10 sections. The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.
Since the creation of article "Tournoi de tennis de Boston (dames 1961)", its content was written by 4 registered users of French Wikipedia and edited by 4 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 29 times in French Wikipedia and cited 29 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | French: #1216398 04.2019 |
Global: #8710937 02.2016 |
| Best Rank | French: #56745 12.2015 |
Global: #782973 12.2015 |
On 5 January 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Squid Game, Squid Game, season 2, Avicii, Nosferatu, Epiphany, human metapneumovirus, Jimmy Carter, Elon Musk, Jeff Baena, Aubrey Plaza.
In French Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Steven Spielberg, The Fabelmans, Gad Elmaleh, Épiphanie, Julien Poulin, Michel Fugain, Michèle Bernier, Claude Allègre, Attentat contre Charlie Hebdo, La Chute de Londres.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(4.36+0.52+0+38.46+11.84)-0.55$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
