Article "Histoire du GIGN" in French Wikipedia has 61.7 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 55 references and 19 sections.
Since the creation of article "Histoire du GIGN", its content was written by 17 registered users of French Wikipedia and edited by 17 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 8 times in French Wikipedia and cited 8 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | French: #3205 04.2023 |
Global: #127453 04.2023 |
| Best Rank | French: #19331 05.2023 |
Global: #419030 01.2015 |
On 12 March 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Elon Musk, 2024–25 UEFA Champions League, UEFA Champions League, Diego Simeone, Kim Sae-ron, Kim Soo-hyun, Greenland, Giuliano Simeone, Donald Trump, ChatGPT.
In French Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Ligue des champions de l'UEFA 2024-2025, Jacques Audiard, Ligue des champions de l'UEFA, Désiré Doué, Elon Musk, Diego Simeone, Dominique de Villepin, Les Cerfs-volants de Kaboul, Kétamine, Leïla Bekhti.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(54.37+28.8+100+73.08+52.21)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
