Elijah Johnson - American colonial agent. Article "Elijah Johnson" in French Wikipedia has 31.9 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 28 references and 8 sections.
Since the creation of article "Elijah Johnson", its content was written by 14 registered users of French Wikipedia and edited by 14 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 3 times in French Wikipedia and cited 3 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | French: #598374 04.2019 |
Global: #5310843 04.2019 |
| Best Rank | French: #4231 04.2019 |
Global: #148205 04.2019 |
On 5 January 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Squid Game, Squid Game, season 2, Avicii, Nosferatu, Epiphany, human metapneumovirus, Jimmy Carter, Elon Musk, Jeff Baena, Aubrey Plaza.
In French Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Steven Spielberg, The Fabelmans, Gad Elmaleh, Épiphanie, Julien Poulin, Michel Fugain, Michèle Bernier, Claude Allègre, Attentat contre Charlie Hebdo, La Chute de Londres.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(14.2+14.66+0+30.77+100)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
