Article "2017 en numismatique" in French Wikipedia has 16.2 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 4 references and 4 sections. The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.
Since the creation of article "2017 en numismatique", its content was written by 9 registered users of French Wikipedia and edited by 9 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 165 times in French Wikipedia and cited 165 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | French: #467416 12.2017 |
Global: #4228479 11.2017 |
| Best Rank | French: #11942 05.2018 |
Global: #300127 05.2018 |
On 16 June 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Iran, 2025 FIFA Club World Cup, Israel, Ali Khamenei, FIFA Club World Cup, Benjamin Netanyahu, Ruhollah Khomeini, Iran–Israel proxy conflict, G7, Mohammad Reza I of Iran.
In French Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Coupe du monde des clubs de la FIFA 2025, Les Gardiennes (film), Iran, Coupe du monde des clubs de la FIFA, Ali Khamenei, ABBA, Israël, Abdé Maziane, Luca de Meo, Rima Hassan.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(3.2+2.09+0+15.38+64.59)-0.85$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
