Juha Partanen - Finnish journalist. Article “Juha Partanen” in Finnish Wikipedia has 3.9 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025).
Since the creation of article “Juha Partanen”, its content was written by 10 registered users of Finnish Wikipedia and edited by 10 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 10 times in Finnish Wikipedia and cited 10 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Finnish: #9315 12.2024 |
Global: #1352235 12.2024 |
| Best Rank | Finnish: #1676 05.2008 |
Global: #286041 05.2008 |
On 21 February 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Jeffrey Epstein, Alysa Liu, Eric Dane, 2026 Winter Olympics, Rebecca Gayheart, Johannes Høsflot Klæbo, Wuthering Heights, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, John F. Kennedy Jr..
In Finnish Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Iivo Niskanen, Johannes Høsflot Klæbo, Suomen jääkiekkomaajoukkue, Juuse Saros, Oliver Kapanen, Mikael Granlund, Arsi Ruuskanen, Antti Pennanen (valmentaja), Markku Uusipaavalniemi, Jääkiekko olympialaisissa.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(4.53+0+10+4.76+0)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
