Inundación del mar Negro

es

WikiRank.net
ver. 1.6

Inundación del mar Negro

Quality:

Black Sea deluge hypothesis - hypothetical flood scenario. Article "Inundación del mar Negro" in Spanish Wikipedia has 16.2 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 5 references and 6 sections.

This article has the best quality in English Wikipedia. Also, this article is the most popular in that language version.

Since the creation of article "Inundación del mar Negro", its content was written by 6 registered users of Spanish Wikipedia and edited by 561 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 9 times in Spanish Wikipedia and cited 291 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

  • Local (Spanish): #40336 in February 2015
  • Global: #27995 in November 2004

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

  • Local (Spanish): #167205 in February 2022
  • Global: #72435 in August 2009

There are 21 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

下表顯示了最高品質的文章的語言版本。

Languages with the highest quality

#LanguageQuality gradeQuality score
1English (en)
Black Sea deluge hypothesis
52.2681
2Dutch (nl)
Zwarte Zee, overstroming na de ijstijd
45.6756
3Chinese (zh)
黑海洪水學説
37.9349
4Russian (ru)
Теория черноморского потопа
37.8713
5Bulgarian (bg)
Потоп в Черно море
35.9172
6Turkish (tr)
Karadeniz tufanı hipotezi
31.8377
7Ukrainian (uk)
Теорія Чорноморського потопу
31.28
8Portuguese (pt)
Dilúvio do Mar Negro
22.7635
9Arabic (ar)
نظرية طوفان البحر الأسود
21.3855
10Indonesian (id)
Hipotesis air bah Laut Hitam
19.8456
More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

Most popular in all the time

The most popular language versions of the article "Inundación del mar Negro" in all the time
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Black Sea deluge hypothesis
1 595 641
2Russian (ru)
Теория черноморского потопа
440 529
3Japanese (ja)
黒海洪水説
184 941
4Portuguese (pt)
Dilúvio do Mar Negro
116 025
5Italian (it)
Inondazione preistorica del Mar Nero
80 062
6Dutch (nl)
Zwarte Zee, overstroming na de ijstijd
73 212
7Polish (pl)
Teoria Ryana-Pitmana
31 885
8Turkish (tr)
Karadeniz tufanı hipotezi
31 436
9Spanish (es)
Inundación del mar Negro
31 030
10Bulgarian (bg)
Потоп в Черно море
24 064
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

Most popular in October 2023

The most popular language versions of the article "Inundación del mar Negro" in October 2023
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Black Sea deluge hypothesis
9 444
2Russian (ru)
Теория черноморского потопа
2 939
3Japanese (ja)
黒海洪水説
805
4Italian (it)
Inondazione preistorica del Mar Nero
444
5Spanish (es)
Inundación del mar Negro
413
6Portuguese (pt)
Dilúvio do Mar Negro
364
7Dutch (nl)
Zwarte Zee, overstroming na de ijstijd
352
8Arabic (ar)
نظرية طوفان البحر الأسود
310
9Bulgarian (bg)
Потоп в Черно море
286
10Ukrainian (uk)
Теорія Чорноморського потопу
225
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

The highest AI

Language versions of the article "Inundación del mar Negro" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Black Sea deluge hypothesis
229
2Russian (ru)
Теория черноморского потопа
73
3Italian (it)
Inondazione preistorica del Mar Nero
58
4Dutch (nl)
Zwarte Zee, overstroming na de ijstijd
36
5Ukrainian (uk)
Теорія Чорноморського потопу
25
6Japanese (ja)
黒海洪水説
21
7Portuguese (pt)
Dilúvio do Mar Negro
18
8Turkish (tr)
Karadeniz tufanı hipotezi
18
9Polish (pl)
Teoria Ryana-Pitmana
13
10Croatian (hr)
Ryan-Pitmanova teorija o potopu
10
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

The highest AI in October 2023

Language versions of the article "Inundación del mar Negro" with the highest AI in October 2023
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1Bulgarian (bg)
Потоп в Черно море
2
2Azerbaijani (az)
Qara dənizdə daşqın nəzəriyyəsi
1
3Turkish (tr)
Karadeniz tufanı hipotezi
1
4Ukrainian (uk)
Теорія Чорноморського потопу
1
5Arabic (ar)
نظرية طوفان البحر الأسود
0
6English (en)
Black Sea deluge hypothesis
0
7Spanish (es)
Inundación del mar Negro
0
8Persian (fa)
فرضیه سیل دریای سیاه
0
9Croatian (hr)
Ryan-Pitmanova teorija o potopu
0
10Indonesian (id)
Hipotesis air bah Laut Hitam
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

The highest CI

Language versions of the article "Inundación del mar Negro" with the highest Citation Index (CI)
#LanguageCI awardRelative CI
1English (en)
Black Sea deluge hypothesis
115
2Persian (fa)
فرضیه سیل دریای سیاه
25
3Russian (ru)
Теория черноморского потопа
25
4Ukrainian (uk)
Теорія Чорноморського потопу
19
5Japanese (ja)
黒海洪水説
15
6Dutch (nl)
Zwarte Zee, overstroming na de ijstijd
15
7Bulgarian (bg)
Потоп в Черно море
11
8Italian (it)
Inondazione preistorica del Mar Nero
10
9Spanish (es)
Inundación del mar Negro
9
10Turkish (tr)
Karadeniz tufanı hipotezi
9
More...

Scores

Estimated value for Wikipedia:
Spanish:
Global:
Popularity in October 2023:
Spanish:
Global:
Popularity in all years:
Spanish:
Global:
Authors in October 2023:
Spanish:
Global:
Registered authors in all years:
Spanish:
Global:
Citations:
Spanish:
Global:

Quality measures

Interwikis

#LanguageValue
arArabic
نظرية طوفان البحر الأسود
azAzerbaijani
Qara dənizdə daşqın nəzəriyyəsi
bgBulgarian
Потоп в Черно море
enEnglish
Black Sea deluge hypothesis
esSpanish
Inundación del mar Negro
faPersian
فرضیه سیل دریای سیاه
hrCroatian
Ryan-Pitmanova teorija o potopu
idIndonesian
Hipotesis air bah Laut Hitam
itItalian
Inondazione preistorica del Mar Nero
jaJapanese
黒海洪水説
kaGeorgian
შავი ზღვის დატბორვის თეორია
msMalay
Hipotesis banjir Laut Hitam
nlDutch
Zwarte Zee, overstroming na de ijstijd
plPolish
Teoria Ryana-Pitmana
ptPortuguese
Dilúvio do Mar Negro
ruRussian
Теория черноморского потопа
shSerbo-Croatian
Teorija o potopu Crnog mora
srSerbian
Теорија црноморског потопа
trTurkish
Karadeniz tufanı hipotezi
ukUkrainian
Теорія Чорноморського потопу
zhChinese
黑海洪水學説

Popularity rank trends

Best Rank Spanish:
#167205
02.2022
Global:
#72435
08.2009

AI rank trends

Best Rank Spanish:
#40336
02.2015
Global:
#27995
11.2004

Languages comparison

Important global interconnections

Wikipedia readers most often find their way to information on Black Sea deluge hypothesis from Wikipedia articles about Zanclean flood, Noahs Ark, Black Sea, Deluge myth and Sea of Azov. Whereas reading the article about Black Sea deluge hypothesis people most often go to Wikipedia articles on Black Sea undersea river, Deluge myth, Zanclean flood, Black Sea and Altai flood.

Cumulative results of quality and popularity of the Wikipedia article

List of Wikipedia articles in different languages (starting with the most popular):

News from 25 June 2024

On 25 June 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: UEFA Euro 2024, Julian Assange, UEFA European Championship, UEFA Euro 2020, Shifty Shellshock, 2024 Copa América, WikiLeaks, YouTube, Inside Out 2, House of the Dragon.

In Spanish Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Eurocopa 2024, Cleopatra I de Egipto, Copa América 2024, Copa América, Eurocopa, Julian Assange, Gustavo Alfaro, Patrick Sequeira, Pombero, Joel Campbell.

About WikiRank

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information