Stub list of Yugoslavian Esperantists - Wikimedia list article. Article "Ĝermolisto de jugoslavaj esperantistoj" in Esperanto Wikipedia has 23.4 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 0 references and 29 sections.
Since the creation of article "Ĝermolisto de jugoslavaj esperantistoj", its content was written by 18 registered users of Esperanto Wikipedia and edited by 18 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 88 times in Esperanto Wikipedia and cited 88 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Esperanto: #476 10.2021 |
Global: #1469926 01.2008 |
On 6 May 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Bernard Hill, YouTube, Eurovision Song Contest 2024, Lando Norris, Anne Hathaway, Facebook, Nicholas Galitzine, ChatGPT, The Idea of You, deaths in 2024.
In Esperanto Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó, Islamo, Esperanto, Vikipedio, Bautzen, Dua Mondmilito, Vikipedio en Esperanto, Bernard Pivot, Cirkumcido, Kurosawa Akira.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(16.9+0+0+100+0)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
