Article "Ĝermolisto de kubaj esperantistoj" in Esperanto Wikipedia has 29.9 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 0 references and 90 sections.
Since the creation of article "Ĝermolisto de kubaj esperantistoj", its content was written by 4 registered users of Esperanto Wikipedia and edited by 4 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 5 times in Esperanto Wikipedia and cited 5 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Esperanto: #5359 12.2022 |
Global: #8667633 12.2022 |
| Best Rank | Esperanto: #1173 06.2024 |
Global: #918793 06.2024 |
On 26 October 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Ilia Topuria, Lyle and Erik Menendez, Hansi Flick, Venom: The Last Dance, El Clásico, 2024 United States presidential election, Khamzat Chimaev, BRICS, Max Holloway, Shohei Ohtani.
In Esperanto Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Topoľčianky, Frozen 2, Kalifornia Instituto de Teknologio, Masaĉuseca Instituto de Teknologio, Dua Mondmilito, Sebastian Kirf, RSS, Esperanto, Natria manganato, Informa teknologio.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(49.35+0+0+100+0)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
