Rate–distortion theory

en

WikiRank.net
ver. 1.6

Rate–distortion theory

Quality:

Article "Rate–distortion theory" in English Wikipedia has 34.9 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 5 references and 11 sections. The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.

In this language version of Wikipedia the article has the best quality. Also, this article is the most popular in that language version.

Since the creation of article "Rate–distortion theory", its content was written by 64 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 101 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 189 times in English Wikipedia and cited 410 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

  • Local (English): #1680 in March 2003
  • Global: #4138 in March 2003

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

  • Local (English): #176361 in March 2009
  • Global: #281404 in March 2009

There are 5 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

Languages with the highest quality

#LanguageQuality gradeQuality score
1English (en)
Rate–distortion theory
34.8794
2Chinese (zh)
率失真理论
22.7876
3Persian (fa)
نظریه نرخ-اعوجاج
11.3637
4German (de)
Rate-Distortion-Theorie
6.345
5Korean (ko)
부호율-변형 이론
2.1598
More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

Most popular in all the time

The most popular language versions of the article "Rate–distortion theory" in all the time
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Rate–distortion theory
420 325
2Chinese (zh)
率失真理论
39 380
3German (de)
Rate-Distortion-Theorie
17 485
4Korean (ko)
부호율-변형 이론
13 066
5Persian (fa)
نظریه نرخ-اعوجاج
2 975
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

Most popular in June 2025

The most popular language versions of the article "Rate–distortion theory" in June 2025
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Rate–distortion theory
1 932
2Chinese (zh)
率失真理论
254
3German (de)
Rate-Distortion-Theorie
45
4Persian (fa)
نظریه نرخ-اعوجاج
28
5Korean (ko)
부호율-변형 이론
15
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

The highest AI

Language versions of the article "Rate–distortion theory" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Rate–distortion theory
64
2German (de)
Rate-Distortion-Theorie
11
3Korean (ko)
부호율-변형 이론
10
4Persian (fa)
نظریه نرخ-اعوجاج
8
5Chinese (zh)
率失真理论
8
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

The highest AI in June 2025

Language versions of the article "Rate–distortion theory" with the highest AI in June 2025
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1Persian (fa)
نظریه نرخ-اعوجاج
1
2German (de)
Rate-Distortion-Theorie
0
3English (en)
Rate–distortion theory
0
4Korean (ko)
부호율-변형 이론
0
5Chinese (zh)
率失真理论
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

The highest CI

Language versions of the article "Rate–distortion theory" with the highest Citation Index (CI)
#LanguageCI awardRelative CI
1English (en)
Rate–distortion theory
189
2Korean (ko)
부호율-변형 이론
111
3Chinese (zh)
率失真理论
61
4Persian (fa)
نظریه نرخ-اعوجاج
41
5German (de)
Rate-Distortion-Theorie
8
More...

Scores

Estimated value for Wikipedia:
English:
Global:
Popularity in June 2025:
English:
Global:
Popularity in all years:
English:
Global:
Authors in June 2025:
English:
Global:
Registered authors in all years:
English:
Global:
Citations:
English:
Global:

Quality measures

Interwikis

#LanguageValue
deGerman
Rate-Distortion-Theorie
enEnglish
Rate–distortion theory
faPersian
نظریه نرخ-اعوجاج
koKorean
부호율-변형 이론
zhChinese
率失真理论

Popularity rank trends

Best Rank English:
#176361
03.2009
Global:
#281404
03.2009

AI rank trends

Best Rank English:
#1680
03.2003
Global:
#4138
03.2003

Local AI rank history

Global AI rank history

Languages comparison

Important global interconnections (July 2024 – June 2025)

Wikipedia readers most often find their way to information on Rate–distortion theory from Wikipedia articles about Information theory, Noisy-channel coding theorem, Information bottleneck method, Lossy compression and Quantization. Whereas reading the article about Rate–distortion theory people most often go to Wikipedia articles on Blahut–Arimoto algorithm, Rate–distortion optimization, Lossy compression, Decision theory and Claude Shannon.

Cumulative results of quality and popularity of the Wikipedia article

List of Wikipedia articles in different languages (starting with the most popular):

News from 12 August 2025

On 12 August 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Cristiano Ronaldo, Wednesday, Georgina Rodríguez, ChatGPT, Weapons, Jenna Ortega, deaths in 2025, Taylor Swift, Miguel Uribe Turbay, 2025–26 UEFA Champions League.

In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Weapons (2025 film), Danielle Spencer (American actress), Cristiano Ronaldo, Deaths in 2025, Taylor Swift, Wednesday (TV series), Superman (2025 film), Georgina Rodríguez, Coolie (2025 film), The Fantastic Four: First Steps.

About WikiRank

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information