Peter Weill - Australian computer scientist. Article "Peter Weill" in English Wikipedia has 19.9 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 6 references and 4 sections.
Since the creation of article "Peter Weill", its content was written by 12 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 12 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 13 times in English Wikipedia and cited 13 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | English: #1438238 09.2018 |
Global: #2479903 09.2018 |
| Best Rank | English: #142762 11.2013 |
Global: #369033 11.2013 |
On 28 April 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: YouTube, Fallout, Facebook, Baby Reindeer, Challengers, Premier League, Fallout, deaths in 2024, Queen of Tears, Arsenal F.C..
In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Indian Premier League, Richard Gadd, Baby Reindeer, Challengers (film), Next Indian general election, Queen of Tears, Fallout (2024 TV series), Colin Jost, YouTube, 2024 Indian Premier League.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(8.94+4.96+0+28.57+57.03)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
