Michael D'Anna - American film director. Article "Michael D'Anna" in English Wikipedia has 13 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 2 references and 4 sections. The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.
Since the creation of article "Michael D'Anna", its content was written by 16 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 16 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 4 times in English Wikipedia and cited 4 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | English: #1437581 02.2010 |
Global: #2370671 02.2010 |
| Best Rank | English: #149697 01.2018 |
Global: #467127 02.2010 |
On 10 October 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Han Kang, Lyle and Erik Menendez, Rafael Nadal, Sean Combs, George Baldock, Ratan Tata, Hurricane Katrina, Hurricane Milton, Joker: Folie à Deux, Ethel Skakel Kennedy.
In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Ratan Tata, Tata family, Naval Tata, Noel Tata, George Baldock, Ratanji Tata, J. R. D. Tata, Natarajan Chandrasekaran, Simone Tata, Tata Group.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(5.13+1.64+0+28.57+32.87)-0.68$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
