Lill's method

en

WikiRank.net
ver. 1.6.2

Lill's method

Quality:

Lill's method - Graphical method for the real roots of a polynomial. Article “Lill's method” in English Wikipedia has 35.9 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 9 references and 8 sections.

In this language version of Wikipedia the article has the best quality. Also, this article is the most popular in that (English) language version.

Since the creation of article “Lill's method”, its content was written by 28 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 64 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 66 times in English Wikipedia and cited 84 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

  • Local (English): #16839 in February 2012
  • Global: #104447 in February 2012

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

  • Local (English): #110072 in August 2017
  • Global: #194454 in August 2017

There are 6 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

Languages with the highest quality

#LanguageQuality gradeQuality score
1English (en)
Lill's method
35.8599
2German (de)
Lills Methode
33.568
3Ukrainian (uk)
Метод Ліля
25.671
4Russian (ru)
Метод Лиля
20.5814
5French (fr)
Orthogone de Lill
9.8389
6Hungarian (hu)
Lill-módszer
4.3757
More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

Most popular in all the time

The most popular language versions of the article "Lill's method" in all the time
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Lill's method
78 321
2Russian (ru)
Метод Лиля
17 883
3German (de)
Lills Methode
5 613
4French (fr)
Orthogone de Lill
787
5Ukrainian (uk)
Метод Ліля
641
6Hungarian (hu)
Lill-módszer
309
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

Most popular in June 2025

The most popular language versions of the article "Lill's method" in June 2025
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Lill's method
766
2Russian (ru)
Метод Лиля
68
3German (de)
Lills Methode
25
4Ukrainian (uk)
Метод Ліля
16
5French (fr)
Orthogone de Lill
15
6Hungarian (hu)
Lill-módszer
10
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

The highest AI

Language versions of the article "Lill's method" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Lill's method
28
2German (de)
Lills Methode
19
3French (fr)
Orthogone de Lill
9
4Russian (ru)
Метод Лиля
5
5Hungarian (hu)
Lill-módszer
2
6Ukrainian (uk)
Метод Ліля
1
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

The highest AI in June 2025

Language versions of the article "Lill's method" with the highest AI in June 2025
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1German (de)
Lills Methode
1
2English (en)
Lill's method
0
3French (fr)
Orthogone de Lill
0
4Hungarian (hu)
Lill-módszer
0
5Russian (ru)
Метод Лиля
0
6Ukrainian (uk)
Метод Ліля
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

The highest CI

Language versions of the article "Lill's method" with the highest Citation Index (CI)
#LanguageCI awardRelative CI
1English (en)
Lill's method
66
2Russian (ru)
Метод Лиля
7
3Ukrainian (uk)
Метод Ліля
6
4German (de)
Lills Methode
3
5French (fr)
Orthogone de Lill
2
6Hungarian (hu)
Lill-módszer
0
More...

Scores

Estimated value for Wikipedia:
English:
Global:
Popularity in June 2025:
English:
Global:
Popularity in all years:
English:
Global:
Authors in June 2025:
English:
Global:
Registered authors in all years:
English:
Global:
Citations:
English:
Global:

Quality measures

Interwikis

#LanguageValue
deGerman
Lills Methode
enEnglish
Lill's method
frFrench
Orthogone de Lill
huHungarian
Lill-módszer
ruRussian
Метод Лиля
ukUkrainian
Метод Ліля

Popularity rank trends

Best Rank English:
#110072
08.2017
Global:
#194454
08.2017

AI rank trends

Best Rank English:
#16839
02.2012
Global:
#104447
02.2012

Languages comparison

Important global interconnections (July 2024 – June 2025)

Wikipedia readers most often find their way to information on Lill's method from Wikipedia articles about Ruffinis rule, Horners method, Mathematics of paper folding, Abel–Ruffini theorem and Quadratic equation. Whereas reading the article about Lill's method people most often go to Wikipedia articles on Carlyle circle, Horners method, Eduard Lill, Margherita Beloch Piazzolla and Thales theorem.

Cumulative results of quality and popularity of the Wikipedia article

List of Wikipedia articles in different languages (starting with the most popular):

News from 28 January 2026

On 28 January 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: 2025–26 UEFA Champions League, Nipah virus, Doomsday Clock, UEFA Champions League, Elena Rybakina, Donald Trump, 2026 European Men's Handball Championship, killing of Alex Pretti, Kristi Noem, deaths in 2026.

In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Ajit Pawar, Border 2, Sharad Pawar, Killing of Alex Pretti, Ilhan Omar, Sunetra Pawar, Todd Monken, Kristi Noem, Wonder Man (miniseries), Gregory Bovino.

About WikiRank

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information