John Hood - Wikimedia disambiguation page. Article "John Hood" in English Wikipedia has 4.8 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 0 references and 3 sections.
Since the creation of article "John Hood", its content was written by 19 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 19 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 5 times in English Wikipedia and cited 5 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | English: #301360 06.2008 |
Global: #478105 06.2008 |
| Best Rank | English: #39284 04.2016 |
Global: #147671 04.2016 |
On 23 April 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: YouTube, Serie A, Shōgun, Fallout, Facebook, Fallout, Saint George, Saint George Day, Inter Milan, ChatGPT.
In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Indian Premier League, Richard Gadd, Baby Reindeer, Shōgun (upcoming TV series), Saint George's Day, Fallout (2024 TV series), Deaths in 2024, Benjamin Brand, 2024 Indian Premier League, Next Indian general election.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(2.68+0+0+21.43+0)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
