Jake Spanner, Private Eye - 1989 film by Lee H. Katzin. Article "Jake Spanner, Private Eye" in English Wikipedia has 17.5 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 3 references and 5 sections.
Since the creation of article "Jake Spanner, Private Eye", its content was written by 10 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 10 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 31 times in English Wikipedia and cited 31 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | English: #1764660 08.2017 |
Global: #3100885 07.2016 |
| Best Rank | English: #302733 09.2023 |
Global: #733428 04.2024 |
On 5 January 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Squid Game, Squid Game, season 2, Avicii, Nosferatu, Epiphany, human metapneumovirus, Jimmy Carter, Elon Musk, Jeff Baena, Aubrey Plaza.
In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Jeff Baena, Aubrey Plaza, The Vivienne, Squid Game season 2, Brothers Home, Nosferatu (2024 film), Squid Game, Jimmy Carter, Pushpa 2: The Rule, Pan Am Flight 103.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(5.81+2.46+0+35.71+43.54)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
