Hole argument

en

WikiRank.net
ver. 1.6.3

Hole argument

Quality:

Hole argument - philosophical argument against general covariance. Article “Hole argument” in English Wikipedia has 30 points for quality (as of July 1, 2026). The article contains 14 references and 9 sections. The article also contains templates indicating quality issues, therefore its score was reduced by 1.58 points.

In this language version of Wikipedia the article has the best quality. Also, this article is the most popular in that (English) language version.

Since the creation of article “Hole argument”, its content was written by 84 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 119 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 15 times in English Wikipedia and cited 27 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

  • Local (English): #12491 in October 2013
  • Global: #48752 in October 2013

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

  • Local (English): #409791 in October 2013
  • Global: #686213 in October 2013

There are 5 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2026 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

Languages with the highest quality

#LanguageQuality gradeQuality score
1English (en)
Hole argument
30.0299
2Portuguese (pt)
Argumento do buraco
22.6228
3Turkish (tr)
Delik iddiası
20.1752
4Chinese (zh)
空穴論證
18.0134
5Spanish (es)
Argumento del agujero
11.5037
More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

Most popular in all the time

The most popular language versions of the article "Hole argument" in all the time
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Hole argument
158 324
2Chinese (zh)
空穴論證
10 113
3Portuguese (pt)
Argumento do buraco
1 499
4Turkish (tr)
Delik iddiası
1 311
5Spanish (es)
Argumento del agujero
913
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

Most popular in June 2026

The most popular language versions of the article "Hole argument" in June 2026
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Hole argument
441
2Chinese (zh)
空穴論證
55
3Turkish (tr)
Delik iddiası
15
4Spanish (es)
Argumento del agujero
14
5Portuguese (pt)
Argumento do buraco
13
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

The highest AI

Language versions of the article "Hole argument" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Hole argument
84
2Turkish (tr)
Delik iddiası
19
3Chinese (zh)
空穴論證
6
4Spanish (es)
Argumento del agujero
5
5Portuguese (pt)
Argumento do buraco
5
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

The highest AI in June 2026

Language versions of the article "Hole argument" with the highest AI in June 2026
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Hole argument
0
2Spanish (es)
Argumento del agujero
0
3Portuguese (pt)
Argumento do buraco
0
4Turkish (tr)
Delik iddiası
0
5Chinese (zh)
空穴論證
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

The highest CI

Language versions of the article "Hole argument" with the highest Citation Index (CI)
#LanguageCI awardRelative CI
1English (en)
Hole argument
15
2Spanish (es)
Argumento del agujero
4
3Chinese (zh)
空穴論證
4
4Portuguese (pt)
Argumento do buraco
3
5Turkish (tr)
Delik iddiası
1
More...

Scores

Estimated value for Wikipedia:
English:
Global:
Popularity in June 2026:
English:
Global:
Popularity in all years:
English:
Global:
Authors in June 2026:
English:
Global:
Registered authors in all years:
English:
Global:
Citations:
English:
Global:

Quality measures

Interwikis

#LanguageValue
enEnglish
Hole argument
esSpanish
Argumento del agujero
ptPortuguese
Argumento do buraco
trTurkish
Delik iddiası
zhChinese
空穴論證

Popularity rank trends

Best Rank English:
#409791
10.2013
Global:
#686213
10.2013

AI rank trends

Best Rank English:
#12491
10.2013
Global:
#48752
10.2013

Languages comparison

Important global interconnections (July 2025 – June 2026)

Wikipedia readers most often find their way to information on Hole argument from Wikipedia articles about History of general relativity, Albert Einstein, Canonical quantum gravity, John Earman and John D. Norton. Whereas reading the article about Hole argument people most often go to Wikipedia articles on General covariance, Philosophy of space and time, Erich Kretschmann, AdS/CFT correspondence and History of general relativity.

Cumulative results of quality and popularity of the Wikipedia article

List of Wikipedia articles in different languages (starting with the most popular):

News from 1 July 2026

On 1 July 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: 2026 FIFA World Cup, Kylian Mbappé, Erling Haaland, Democratic Republic of the Congo, FIFA World Cup, Harry Kane, Romelu Lukaku, Senegal, Michael Olise, Sadio Mané.

In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: 2026 FIFA World Cup, Harry Kane, Julián Quiñones, List of FIFA World Cup top goalscorers, Kylian Mbappé, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Erling Haaland, DR Congo national football team, Melat Kiros, FIFA World Cup.

About WikiRank

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 50 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2026. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2026 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2026... More information