Article "Guillaume Stengel" in English Wikipedia has 31.1 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 7 references and 3 sections.
Since the creation of article "Guillaume Stengel", its content was written by 12 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 12 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 1 times in English Wikipedia and cited 1 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | English: #3587417 06.2017 |
Global: #6632216 06.2017 |
| Best Rank | English: #292616 10.2022 |
Global: #736971 10.2015 |
On 20 December 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Magdeburg, Mufasa: The Lion King, Elon Musk, Mazan rape case, Gisèle Pelicot, Superman, Ayrton Senna, Isack Hadjar, deaths in 2024, David Corenswet.
In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Gisèle Pelicot, Pushpa 2: The Rule, Superman (2025 film), Fair catch kick, Sonic the Hedgehog 3 (film), Mufasa: The Lion King, Mazan rapes, .xxx, List of highest-grossing Indian films, The Hooded Man.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(6.33+5.74+28.57+21.43+93.29)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
