Formal fallacy

en

WikiRank.net
ver. 1.6.2

Formal fallacy

Quality:

Formal fallacy - deductive argument that is invalid due to faulty reasoning, regardless of the truthiness of the conclusion. Article “Formal fallacy” in English Wikipedia has 19.9 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 8 references and 6 sections. The article also contains templates indicating quality issues, therefore its score was reduced by 3.51 points.

In this language version of Wikipedia the article has the best quality. Also, this article is the most popular in that (English) language version.

In June 2025 the article “Formal fallacy” was edited by 1 authors in English Wikipedia and written by 6 authors in all languages.

Since the creation of article “Formal fallacy”, its content was written by 511 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 604 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 552 times in English Wikipedia and cited 846 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

  • Local (English): #99 in May 2003
  • Global: #534 in December 2001

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

  • Local (English): #9097 in June 2015
  • Global: #19674 in June 2008

There are 10 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

Languages with the highest quality

#LanguageQuality gradeQuality score
1English (en)
Formal fallacy
19.9162
2Bulgarian (bg)
Формална логическа грешка
17.4769
3Arabic (ar)
مغالطة صورية
15.929
4Indonesian (id)
Kesesatan formal
11.1096
5Romanian (ro)
Erori formale de logică
8.3178
6Portuguese (pt)
Falácia formal
8.234
7Chinese (zh)
形式謬誤
7.8654
8Korean (ko)
형식적 오류
7.1088
9Polish (pl)
Błąd formalny
5.8592
10Swedish (sv)
Felslut
5.3588
More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

Most popular in all the time

The most popular language versions of the article "Formal fallacy" in all the time
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Formal fallacy
6 917 539
2Polish (pl)
Błąd formalny
155 042
3Chinese (zh)
形式謬誤
68 206
4Swedish (sv)
Felslut
56 777
5Portuguese (pt)
Falácia formal
49 522
6Arabic (ar)
مغالطة صورية
39 246
7Romanian (ro)
Erori formale de logică
31 599
8Bulgarian (bg)
Формална логическа грешка
4 039
9Indonesian (id)
Kesesatan formal
3 839
10Korean (ko)
형식적 오류
350
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

Most popular in June 2025

The most popular language versions of the article "Formal fallacy" in June 2025
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Formal fallacy
13 059
2Polish (pl)
Błąd formalny
340
3Chinese (zh)
形式謬誤
303
4Swedish (sv)
Felslut
148
5Portuguese (pt)
Falácia formal
145
6Arabic (ar)
مغالطة صورية
97
7Romanian (ro)
Erori formale de logică
84
8Korean (ko)
형식적 오류
76
9Indonesian (id)
Kesesatan formal
28
10Bulgarian (bg)
Формална логическа грешка
23
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

The highest AI

Language versions of the article "Formal fallacy" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Formal fallacy
511
2Polish (pl)
Błąd formalny
20
3Swedish (sv)
Felslut
18
4Portuguese (pt)
Falácia formal
17
5Arabic (ar)
مغالطة صورية
12
6Chinese (zh)
形式謬誤
11
7Bulgarian (bg)
Формална логическа грешка
6
8Indonesian (id)
Kesesatan formal
4
9Romanian (ro)
Erori formale de logică
4
10Korean (ko)
형식적 오류
1
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

The highest AI in June 2025

Language versions of the article "Formal fallacy" with the highest AI in June 2025
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1Arabic (ar)
مغالطة صورية
4
2English (en)
Formal fallacy
1
3Indonesian (id)
Kesesatan formal
1
4Bulgarian (bg)
Формална логическа грешка
0
5Korean (ko)
형식적 오류
0
6Polish (pl)
Błąd formalny
0
7Portuguese (pt)
Falácia formal
0
8Romanian (ro)
Erori formale de logică
0
9Swedish (sv)
Felslut
0
10Chinese (zh)
形式謬誤
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

The highest CI

Language versions of the article "Formal fallacy" with the highest Citation Index (CI)
#LanguageCI awardRelative CI
1English (en)
Formal fallacy
552
2Chinese (zh)
形式謬誤
191
3Swedish (sv)
Felslut
55
4Arabic (ar)
مغالطة صورية
17
5Portuguese (pt)
Falácia formal
10
6Polish (pl)
Błąd formalny
8
7Korean (ko)
형식적 오류
5
8Indonesian (id)
Kesesatan formal
4
9Bulgarian (bg)
Формална логическа грешка
3
10Romanian (ro)
Erori formale de logică
1
More...

Scores

Estimated value for Wikipedia:
English:
Global:
Popularity in June 2025:
English:
Global:
Popularity in all years:
English:
Global:
Authors in June 2025:
English:
Global:
Registered authors in all years:
English:
Global:
Citations:
English:
Global:

Quality measures

Interwikis

#LanguageValue
arArabic
مغالطة صورية
bgBulgarian
Формална логическа грешка
enEnglish
Formal fallacy
idIndonesian
Kesesatan formal
koKorean
형식적 오류
plPolish
Błąd formalny
ptPortuguese
Falácia formal
roRomanian
Erori formale de logică
svSwedish
Felslut
zhChinese
形式謬誤

Popularity rank trends

Best Rank English:
#9097
06.2015
Global:
#19674
06.2008

AI rank trends

Best Rank English:
#99
05.2003
Global:
#534
12.2001

Local popularity rank history

Local AI rank history

Global AI rank history

Languages comparison

Important global interconnections (July 2024 – June 2025)

Wikipedia readers most often find their way to information on Formal fallacy from Wikipedia articles about List of fallacies, Non-sequitur, Informal fallacy, Non sequitur and Fallacy. Whereas reading the article about Formal fallacy people most often go to Wikipedia articles on List of fallacies, Fallacy, Non-sequitur, Affirming the consequent and Informal fallacy.

Cumulative results of quality and popularity of the Wikipedia article

List of Wikipedia articles in different languages (starting with the most popular):

News from 15 February 2026

On 15 February 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Jeffrey Epstein, Wuthering Heights, 2026 Winter Olympics, Epstein files, Ilia Malinin, Wuthering Heights, Ghislaine Maxwell, Lucas Pinheiro Braathen, 2026 Winter Olympics medal table, Valentine's Day.

In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Jeffrey Epstein, Wuthering Heights, Wuthering Heights (2026 film), 2026 Winter Olympics, Lucas Pinheiro Braathen, Ice hockey at the 2026 Winter Olympics – Men's tournament, Epstein files, John F. Kennedy Jr., Anthony Kim, James Van Der Beek.

About WikiRank

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information