Explanatory gap

en

WikiRank.net
ver. 1.6.2

Explanatory gap

Quality:

Explanatory gap - inability to describe conscious experiences in soley physical or structural terms. Article “Explanatory gap” in English Wikipedia has 24 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 16 references and 5 sections. The article also contains templates indicating quality issues, therefore its score was reduced by 1.27 points.

In this language version of Wikipedia the article has the best quality. Also, this article is the most popular in that (English) language version.

Since the creation of article “Explanatory gap”, its content was written by 64 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 127 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 110 times in English Wikipedia and cited 390 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

  • Local (English): #12256 in July 2003
  • Global: #21672 in July 2003

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

  • Local (English): #147268 in February 2013
  • Global: #238279 in February 2013

There are 13 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

Languages with the highest quality

#LanguageQuality gradeQuality score
1English (en)
Explanatory gap
24.045
2Arabic (ar)
ثغرة الشرح
21.4858
3German (de)
Erklärungslücke
20.0712
4Chinese (zh)
解释鸿沟
18.6576
5Persian (fa)
شکاف تبیینی
17.3735
6French (fr)
Fossé explicatif
16.0265
7Italian (it)
Lacune esplicative
12.9458
8Uzbek (uz)
Tushuntirish boʻshligʻi
10.2754
9Portuguese (pt)
Lacuna explanatória
9.9536
10Russian (ru)
Разрыв в объяснении
4.8067
More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

Most popular in all the time

The most popular language versions of the article "Explanatory gap" in all the time
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Explanatory gap
315 558
2Japanese (ja)
説明のギャップ
37 449
3German (de)
Erklärungslücke
23 198
4Russian (ru)
Разрыв в объяснении
16 464
5Persian (fa)
شکاف تبیینی
9 376
6Chinese (zh)
解释鸿沟
7 116
7Arabic (ar)
ثغرة الشرح
4 525
8Italian (it)
Lacune esplicative
2 675
9Portuguese (pt)
Lacuna explanatória
2 594
10Spanish (es)
Vacío explicativo
2 479
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

Most popular in June 2025

The most popular language versions of the article "Explanatory gap" in June 2025
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Explanatory gap
2 015
2Russian (ru)
Разрыв в объяснении
134
3Chinese (zh)
解释鸿沟
127
4Japanese (ja)
説明のギャップ
105
5German (de)
Erklärungslücke
65
6Portuguese (pt)
Lacuna explanatória
35
7French (fr)
Fossé explicatif
33
8Korean (ko)
설명적 간극
29
9Persian (fa)
شکاف تبیینی
27
10Arabic (ar)
ثغرة الشرح
25
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

The highest AI

Language versions of the article "Explanatory gap" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Explanatory gap
64
2German (de)
Erklärungslücke
15
3Portuguese (pt)
Lacuna explanatória
11
4Italian (it)
Lacune esplicative
8
5Spanish (es)
Vacío explicativo
5
6French (fr)
Fossé explicatif
5
7Japanese (ja)
説明のギャップ
5
8Persian (fa)
شکاف تبیینی
4
9Arabic (ar)
ثغرة الشرح
3
10Russian (ru)
Разрыв в объяснении
3
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

The highest AI in June 2025

Language versions of the article "Explanatory gap" with the highest AI in June 2025
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1Arabic (ar)
ثغرة الشرح
1
2German (de)
Erklärungslücke
0
3English (en)
Explanatory gap
0
4Spanish (es)
Vacío explicativo
0
5Persian (fa)
شکاف تبیینی
0
6French (fr)
Fossé explicatif
0
7Italian (it)
Lacune esplicative
0
8Japanese (ja)
説明のギャップ
0
9Korean (ko)
설명적 간극
0
10Portuguese (pt)
Lacuna explanatória
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

The highest CI

Language versions of the article "Explanatory gap" with the highest Citation Index (CI)
#LanguageCI awardRelative CI
1English (en)
Explanatory gap
110
2Japanese (ja)
説明のギャップ
80
3Chinese (zh)
解释鸿沟
75
4French (fr)
Fossé explicatif
45
5Russian (ru)
Разрыв в объяснении
37
6Persian (fa)
شکاف تبیینی
16
7German (de)
Erklärungslücke
9
8Arabic (ar)
ثغرة الشرح
5
9Spanish (es)
Vacío explicativo
5
10Italian (it)
Lacune esplicative
3
More...

Scores

Estimated value for Wikipedia:
English:
Global:
Popularity in June 2025:
English:
Global:
Popularity in all years:
English:
Global:
Authors in June 2025:
English:
Global:
Registered authors in all years:
English:
Global:
Citations:
English:
Global:

Quality measures

Interwikis

#LanguageValue
arArabic
ثغرة الشرح
deGerman
Erklärungslücke
enEnglish
Explanatory gap
esSpanish
Vacío explicativo
faPersian
شکاف تبیینی
frFrench
Fossé explicatif
itItalian
Lacune esplicative
jaJapanese
説明のギャップ
koKorean
설명적 간극
ptPortuguese
Lacuna explanatória
ruRussian
Разрыв в объяснении
uzUzbek
Tushuntirish boʻshligʻi
zhChinese
解释鸿沟

Popularity rank trends

Best Rank English:
#147268
02.2013
Global:
#238279
02.2013

AI rank trends

Best Rank English:
#12256
07.2003
Global:
#21672
07.2003

Languages comparison

Important global interconnections (July 2024 – June 2025)

Wikipedia readers most often find their way to information on Explanatory gap from Wikipedia articles about Qualia, Hard problem of consciousness, Consciousness, Mind–body dualism and Ideasthesia. Whereas reading the article about Explanatory gap people most often go to Wikipedia articles on Hard problem of consciousness, New mysterianism, Qualia, Joseph Levine and Group C nerve fiber.

Cumulative results of quality and popularity of the Wikipedia article

List of Wikipedia articles in different languages (starting with the most popular):

News from 15 February 2026

On 15 February 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Jeffrey Epstein, Wuthering Heights, 2026 Winter Olympics, Epstein files, Ilia Malinin, Wuthering Heights, Ghislaine Maxwell, Lucas Pinheiro Braathen, 2026 Winter Olympics medal table, Valentine's Day.

In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Jeffrey Epstein, Wuthering Heights, Wuthering Heights (2026 film), 2026 Winter Olympics, Lucas Pinheiro Braathen, Ice hockey at the 2026 Winter Olympics – Men's tournament, Epstein files, John F. Kennedy Jr., Anthony Kim, James Van Der Beek.

About WikiRank

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information