Article "Ealdred of Abingdon" in English Wikipedia has 1.5 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.
Since the creation of article "Ealdred of Abingdon", its content was written by 6 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 6 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 4 times in English Wikipedia and cited 4 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | English: #1426913 04.2008 |
Global: #2340199 04.2008 |
| Best Rank | English: #235494 10.2012 |
Global: #516427 10.2005 |
On 8 December 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Bashar al-Assad, Syria, Syrian civil war, Hafez al-Assad, Asma al-Assad, Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham, Abu Mohammad al-Julani, Alawites, flag of Syria, Ayrton Senna.
In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Bashar al-Assad, Syria, Syrian civil war, Pushpa 2: The Rule, Asma al-Assad, Hafez al-Assad, 2024 Syrian opposition offensives, Abu Mohammad al-Julani, UFC 310, Tahrir al-Sham.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(1.59+0+0+7.14+0)-0.26$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
