Diane Foster - Canadian curler. Article "Diane Foster (curler)" in English Wikipedia has 34.7 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 25 references and 5 sections.
Since the creation of article "Diane Foster (curler)", its content was written by 1 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 1 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 37 times in English Wikipedia and cited 37 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | English: #2842102 03.2024 |
Global: #5087707 03.2024 |
| Best Rank | English: #1092657 05.2022 |
Global: #1757175 05.2024 |
On 25 January 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Donald Trump, Madison Keys, Elon Musk, Aryna Sabalenka, Melania Trump, Emilia Pérez, Abdukodir Khusanov, Pete Hegseth, Nosferatu, Karla Sofía Gascón.
In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Madison Keys, Pete Hegseth, Brian Schottenheimer, Aryna Sabalenka, Donald Trump, Sky Force (film), Elon Musk, Melania Trump, Nosferatu (2024 film), Emilia Pérez.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(17.53+20.49+0+35.71+100)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
