David Scott - Church of England priest. Article "David Scott (priest)" in English Wikipedia has 23.3 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 6 references and 1 sections.
Since the creation of article "David Scott (priest)", its content was written by 7 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 7 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 33 times in English Wikipedia and cited 33 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | English: #3104565 05.2017 |
Global: #5720140 05.2017 |
| Best Rank | English: #384531 06.2017 |
Global: #779748 06.2017 |
On 10 October 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Han Kang, Lyle and Erik Menendez, Rafael Nadal, Sean Combs, George Baldock, Ratan Tata, Hurricane Katrina, Hurricane Milton, Joker: Folie à Deux, Ethel Skakel Kennedy.
In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Ratan Tata, Tata family, Naval Tata, Noel Tata, George Baldock, Ratanji Tata, J. R. D. Tata, Natarajan Chandrasekaran, Simone Tata, Tata Group.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(4.2+4.92+0+7.14+100)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
