Chryseobacterium hagamense - species of bacterium. Article “Chryseobacterium hagamense” in English Wikipedia has 9.1 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 1 references and 3 sections.
Since the creation of article “Chryseobacterium hagamense”, its content was written by 9 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 9 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 1 times in English Wikipedia and cited 1 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | English: #3852310 02.2020 |
Global: #7032449 10.2015 |
| Best Rank | English: #355600 03.2016 |
Global: #878527 03.2016 |
On 26 September 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Claudia Cardinale, One Battle After Another, ChatGPT, Alice in Borderland, Guinness, deaths in 2025, Benjamin Netanyahu, Assata Shakur, Charlie Kirk, Arthur Guinness.
In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Google Chrome, Assata Shakur, James Comey, Voddie Baucham, They Call Him OG, Wounded Knee Massacre, Deaths in 2025, Ryder Cup, House of Guinness, Snake Eyes (1998 film).
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(4.37+0.81+0+21.43+19.12)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
