Article "Samuel Schlaefli" in German Wikipedia has 27.9 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 14 references and 2 sections.
Since the creation of article "Samuel Schlaefli", its content was written by 4 registered users of German Wikipedia and edited by 4 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 3 times in German Wikipedia and cited 3 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | German: #843577 06.2019 |
Global: #5953399 06.2019 |
| Best Rank | German: #11834 06.2019 |
Global: #256740 06.2019 |
On 11 June 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: UEFA Euro 2024, ChatGPT, 2026 FIFA World Cup qualification (AFC), Cristiano Ronaldo, YouTube, UEFA European Championship, deaths in 2024, Malawi, 2024 European Athletics Championships, Hunter Biden.
In German Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Klaus Töpfer, Attentat von Volkhoven, Volt Deutschland, Sahra Wagenknecht, Miroslav Klose, Justin Fashanu, Fußball-Europameisterschaft 2024, Liste der größten Auslegerbrücken, Gianmarco Tamberi, Schafskälte.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(9.09+20.9+0+9.52+100)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
