Article "Ein Fall für Nadja" in German Wikipedia has 27.7 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 6 references and 5 sections.
Since the creation of article "Ein Fall für Nadja", its content was written by 6 registered users of German Wikipedia and edited by 6 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 26 times in German Wikipedia and cited 26 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | German: #128432 02.2022 |
Global: #1234368 02.2022 |
| Best Rank | German: #25688 12.2021 |
Global: #404955 12.2021 |
On 7 February 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Elon Musk, Donald Trump, Bianca Censori, Kanye West, Cristiano Ronaldo, United States Agency for International Development, deaths in 2025, Karla Sofía Gascón, Benson Boone, Irv Gotti.
In German Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Pierre Sanoussi-Bliss, Sag niemals nie, Heidi Reichinnek, Wahl-O-Mat, Liste der größten Auslegerbrücken, Jan van Aken, Alice Weidel, Hatun Sürücü, Jack Nicholson, Anna-Carina Woitschack.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(8.96+8.7+0+23.81+96.97)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
