Article "Charles Houel (Büchsenmacher)" in German Wikipedia has 29.5 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 11 references and 5 sections.
Since the creation of article "Charles Houel (Büchsenmacher)", its content was written by 9 registered users of German Wikipedia and edited by 9 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 3 times in German Wikipedia and cited 3 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | German: #377060 08.2019 |
Global: #2976064 08.2019 |
| Best Rank | German: #2874 08.2019 |
Global: #100688 08.2019 |
On 13 May 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Leo XIV, Eurovision Song Contest 2025, Carlo Ancelotti, Pope Francis, Cooper Flagg, Thunderbolts*, Gérard Depardieu, Cassie Ventura, list of popes, ChatGPT.
In German Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Nadja Abd el Farrag, Peter Fitzek, Eurovision Song Contest 2025, Leo XIV., Gérard Depardieu, Mieze Katz, Liste der größten Auslegerbrücken, Dieter Bohlen, Eishockey-Weltmeisterschaft der Herren 2025, Xatar.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(7.63+15.94+0+23.81+100)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
