Matej Jacina - association football player. Article “Matej Jacina” in Czech Wikipedia has 4.4 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 0 references and 4 sections.
Since the creation of article “Matej Jacina”, its content was written by 2 registered users of Czech Wikipedia and edited by 2 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 2 times in Czech Wikipedia and cited 2 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Czech: #201256 10.2024 |
Global: #7831380 06.2015 |
| Best Rank | Czech: #22136 08.2017 |
Global: #554038 11.2022 |
On 16 March 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: 98th Academy Awards, Michael B. Jordan, Sinners, Jessie Buckley, Paul Thomas Anderson, Sean Penn, One Battle After Another, Amy Madigan, Hamnet, Timothée Chalamet.
In Czech Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Pan Nikdo proti Putinovi, 98. ročník udílení Oscarů, Jedna bitva za druhou, Útok na Pearl Harbor, Marie Antoinetta, Dominik Feri, Škoda Superb, Amelia Earhartová, Michael B. Jordan, Jiří Grygar.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(2.7+0+0+19.05+0)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
