Article "علاء مجيد" in Arabic Wikipedia has 21 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 13 references and 6 sections. The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.
Since the creation of article "علاء مجيد", its content was written by 11 registered users of Arabic Wikipedia and edited by 11 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 2 times in Arabic Wikipedia and cited 2 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Arabic: #66079 01.2022 |
Global: #2174134 01.2022 |
On 15 May 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Robert Fico, Slovakia, Yasuke, New Caledonia, YouTube, ChatGPT, Direction – Social Democracy, Planet of the Apes, deaths in 2024, Alice Munro.
In Arabic Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: الصفحة الرئيسة, الشيهانة العزاز, غازي القصيبي, عبد العزيز بن محمد بن عياف آل مقرن, سلوفاكيا, صالح بن عبد الله العزاز, مشعل الأحمد الجابر الصباح, الدوري الإنجليزي الممتاز, مجزرة مستشفى المعمداني, عبد القادر الجيلاني.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(9.63+6.91+0+20.69+73.49)-1.11$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
