Article "أم كجة" in Arabic Wikipedia has 5.6 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 1 references and 3 sections.
Since the creation of article "أم كجة", its content was written by 7 registered users of Arabic Wikipedia and edited by 7 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 176 times in Arabic Wikipedia and cited 176 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Arabic: #61965 08.2011 |
Global: #3784854 05.2018 |
| Best Rank | Arabic: #4624 12.2016 |
Global: #294220 12.2016 |
On 3 November 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: 2024 United States presidential election, Kamala Harris, Donald Trump, 2024 Formula One World Championship, The Substance, Kemi Badenoch, deaths in 2024, Elon Musk, Venom: The Last Dance, Max Verstappen.
In Arabic Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: الصفحة الرئيسة, سيكس بيستلس, المسيرة الخضراء, الانتخابات الرئاسية الأمريكية 2024, مصطفى فهمي (ممثل), عملية طوفان الأقصى, أسماء الشهور, المغرب, حسين فهمي, محمد السادس بن الحسن.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(4.14+0.53+0+10.34+12.89)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
