重力場中電荷輻射悖論

zh

WikiRank.net
ver. 1.6

重力場中電荷輻射悖論

Quality:

Paradox of radiation of charged particles in a gravitational field - apparent paradox in the context of general relativity. Article "重力場中電荷輻射悖論" in Chinese Wikipedia has 12.1 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 1 references and 4 sections. The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.

This article has the best quality in English Wikipedia. Also, this article is the most popular in that language version.

Since the creation of article "重力場中電荷輻射悖論", its content was written by 2 registered users of Chinese Wikipedia and edited by 36 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

  • Local (Chinese): #24406 in November 2017
  • Global: #164392 in June 2020

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

  • Local (Chinese): #310996 in October 2020
  • Global: #600547 in October 2020

There are 3 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

下表顯示了最高品質的文章的語言版本。

Languages with the highest quality

#LanguageQuality gradeQuality score
1English (en)
Paradox of radiation of charged particles in a gravitational field
22.6249
2Russian (ru)
Парадокс излучения заряженных частиц в гравитационном поле
19.6921
3Chinese (zh)
重力場中電荷輻射悖論
12.0598
More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

Most popular in all the time

The most popular language versions of the article "重力場中電荷輻射悖論" in all the time
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Paradox of radiation of charged particles in a gravitational field
80 863
2Russian (ru)
Парадокс излучения заряженных частиц в гравитационном поле
5 770
3Chinese (zh)
重力場中電荷輻射悖論
1 162
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

Most popular in October 2023

The most popular language versions of the article "重力場中電荷輻射悖論" in October 2023
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Paradox of radiation of charged particles in a gravitational field
950
2Russian (ru)
Парадокс излучения заряженных частиц в гравитационном поле
87
3Chinese (zh)
重力場中電荷輻射悖論
14
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

The highest AI

Language versions of the article "重力場中電荷輻射悖論" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Paradox of radiation of charged particles in a gravitational field
30
2Russian (ru)
Парадокс излучения заряженных частиц в гравитационном поле
4
3Chinese (zh)
重力場中電荷輻射悖論
2
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

The highest AI in October 2023

Language versions of the article "重力場中電荷輻射悖論" with the highest AI in October 2023
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1Russian (ru)
Парадокс излучения заряженных частиц в гравитационном поле
1
2English (en)
Paradox of radiation of charged particles in a gravitational field
0
3Chinese (zh)
重力場中電荷輻射悖論
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

The highest CI

Language versions of the article "重力場中電荷輻射悖論" with the highest Citation Index (CI)
#LanguageCI awardRelative CI
1English (en)
Paradox of radiation of charged particles in a gravitational field
9
2Russian (ru)
Парадокс излучения заряженных частиц в гравитационном поле
0
3Chinese (zh)
重力場中電荷輻射悖論
0
More...

Scores

Estimated value for Wikipedia:
Chinese:
Global:
Popularity in October 2023:
Chinese:
Global:
Popularity in all years:
Chinese:
Global:
Authors in October 2023:
Chinese:
Global:
Registered authors in all years:
Chinese:
Global:
Citations:
Chinese:
Global:

Quality measures

Interwikis

#LanguageValue
enEnglish
Paradox of radiation of charged particles in a gravitational field
ruRussian
Парадокс излучения заряженных частиц в гравитационном поле
zhChinese
重力場中電荷輻射悖論

Popularity rank trends

Best Rank Chinese:
#310996
10.2020
Global:
#600547
10.2020

AI rank trends

Best Rank Chinese:
#24406
11.2017
Global:
#164392
06.2020

Languages comparison

Important global interconnections

Wikipedia readers most often find their way to information on Paradox of radiation of charged particles in a gravitational field from Wikipedia articles about Wheeler–Feynman absorber theory, Relativistic electromagnetism, Maxwells equations in curved spacetime, Liénard–Wiechert potential and List of paradoxes. Whereas reading the article about Paradox of radiation of charged particles in a gravitational field people most often go to Wikipedia articles on Fritz Rohrlich, Equivalence principle, Bremsstrahlung, Ladder paradox and Maxwells equations in curved spacetime.

Cumulative results of quality and popularity of the Wikipedia article

List of Wikipedia articles in different languages (starting with the most popular):

News from 11 June 2024

On 11 June 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: UEFA Euro 2024, ChatGPT, 2026 FIFA World Cup qualification (AFC), Cristiano Ronaldo, YouTube, UEFA European Championship, deaths in 2024, Malawi, 2024 European Athletics Championships, Hunter Biden.

In Chinese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: 墨雨云间, 玫瑰的故事 (电视剧), 2026年國際足協世界盃外圍賽 (亞洲區), Hierarchy (电视剧), 謝京穎, 黃仁勳, 家族榮耀之繼承者, 九龍城寨·圍城, 張書偉, 背着善宰跑.

About WikiRank

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information