Article "Bánh tét lá cẩm" in Vietnamese Wikipedia has 4.7 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 0 references and 3 sections. The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.
Since the creation of article "Bánh tét lá cẩm", its content was written by 7 registered users of Vietnamese Wikipedia and edited by 7 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 2 times in Vietnamese Wikipedia and cited 2 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Vietnamese: #34657 08.2021 |
Global: #2494465 08.2021 |
On 16 May 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Yasuke, New Caledonia, Slovakia, Robert Fico, Bridgerton, YouTube, ChatGPT, deaths in 2024, Planet of the Apes, May 16.
In Vietnamese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Lương Cường, Trương Thị Mai, Lê Minh Hưng, Đài Truyền hình Kỹ thuật số VTC, Bộ Chính trị Ban Chấp hành Trung ương Đảng Cộng sản Việt Nam, Bùi Thị Minh Hoài, Tô Lâm, Nguyễn Trọng Nghĩa, Thường trực Ban Bí thư Trung ương Đảng Cộng sản Việt Nam, Lương Tam Quang.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(1.26+0+8.33+15+0)-0.25$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
