Chiemseemaler - group of humans. Article "Chiemseemaler" in German Wikipedia has 25.8 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 0 references and 2 sections.
Since the creation of article "Chiemseemaler", its content was written by 45 registered users of German Wikipedia and edited by 45 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 31 times in German Wikipedia and cited 31 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | German: #132479 08.2010 |
Global: #929770 01.2009 |
| Best Rank | German: #9836 05.2018 |
Global: #138275 07.2005 |
On 28 April 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: YouTube, Fallout, Facebook, Baby Reindeer, Challengers, Premier League, Fallout, deaths in 2024, Queen of Tears, Arsenal F.C..
In German Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Jenny Schily, Klaus J. Behrendt, Liste der größten Auslegerbrücken, Kalifat, Nahschuss, Tatort: Diesmal ist es anders, Wonder Woman 1984, Nadeshda Brennicke, Michael Verhoeven.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(19.47+0+100+9.52+0)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
