Article "Từ mượn trong tiếng Việt" in Vietnamese Wikipedia has 20.9 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 8 references and 12 sections. The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.
Since the creation of article "Từ mượn trong tiếng Việt", its content was written by 39 registered users of Vietnamese Wikipedia and edited by 39 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 37 times in Vietnamese Wikipedia and cited 37 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Vietnamese: #697 09.2020 |
Global: #213938 10.2020 |
On 23 April 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: YouTube, Serie A, Shōgun, Fallout, Facebook, Fallout, Saint George, Saint George Day, Inter Milan, ChatGPT.
In Vietnamese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Đài Truyền hình Kỹ thuật số VTC, Vương Đình Huệ, Cúp bóng đá U-23 châu Á 2024, Facebook, Cúp bóng đá U-23 châu Á, Chiến dịch Điện Biên Phủ, Đài Á Châu Tự Do, Đài Truyền hình Việt Nam, Việt Nam, Tô Lâm.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(23.24+4.79+8.33+60+19.87)-2.32$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
