Article "Hästhagen, Örebro" in Swedish Wikipedia has 17.2 points for quality (as of January 1, 2021). The article contains, among others metrics, 2 references and 5 sections.
Since the creation of article "Hästhagen, Örebro", its content was written by 9 authors in Swedish Wikipedia and edited by 9 authors in all languages.
The article is cited 88 times in Swedish Wikipedia and cited 88 times in all languages.
The highest Authors’ Interest rank from 2002:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipedia dumps from January 1, 2021 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Swedish: #57717 06.2009 |
Global: #2485651 06.2009 |
| Best Rank | Swedish: #6597 03.2015 |
Global: #878686 03.2015 |
On 14 April 2021 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Bernard Madoff, Elizabeth II, Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, Ramadan, Johannes Gutenberg, UEFA Champions League, Princess Margaret, Countess of Snowdon, April 14, Charles, Prince of Wales, Charles Sobhraj.
In Swedish Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Snabba cash (TV-serie), Tiburtiusdagen, Bernard Madoff, Ramadan, Evin Ahmad, Ankie Bagger, Kungsholms fort, Sverige, Elizabeth II, Erik Grönwall.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 39 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from January, 2021. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from December 2020 was taken into account. For historical values of polularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2002 to 2020... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/6(5.87+2.25+18.75+26.32+37.17+13)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
