Article "Urška Bačovnik Janša" in Slovenian Wikipedia has 28.1 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 5 references and 4 sections.
In October 2023 the article "Urška Bačovnik Janša" was edited by 1 authors in Slovenian Wikipedia (5494th place) and written by 1 authors in all languages.
Since the creation of article "Urška Bačovnik Janša", its content was written by 9 registered users of Slovenian Wikipedia and edited by 9 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 8 times in Slovenian Wikipedia and cited 8 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Slovenian: #111 04.2022 |
Global: #567366 04.2022 |
On 14 April 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Iran, Bayer 04 Leverkusen, Israel, Fallout, Iron Dome, Xabi Alonso, Max Holloway, Fallout, YouTube, Bundesliga.
In Slovenian Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Marija Antoaneta, Facebook, Iran, Svetlana Slapšak, Izrael, Scientologija, Matjaž Han, Ludvik XVI. Francoski, Skrito v raju, Učna leta izumitelja Polža.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(7.74+7.35+11.11+23.53+91.01)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
