This book is the 75th most popular in Slovenian Wikipedia. Article "Muca Copatarica" in Slovenian Wikipedia has 6.7 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 0 references and 3 sections.
Since the creation of article "Muca Copatarica", its content was written by 12 registered users of Slovenian Wikipedia (9045th place) and edited by 12 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
Muca Copatarica is on the 75th place in local ranking of books on Slovenian Wikipedia in all the time.
The article is cited 10 times in Slovenian Wikipedia and cited 10 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Slovenian: #1372 09.2023 |
Global: #1376346 11.2008 |
On 14 April 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Iran, Bayer 04 Leverkusen, Israel, Fallout, Iron Dome, Xabi Alonso, Max Holloway, Fallout, YouTube, Bundesliga.
In Slovenian Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Marija Antoaneta, Facebook, Iran, Svetlana Slapšak, Izrael, Scientologija, Matjaž Han, Ludvik XVI. Francoski, Skrito v raju, Učna leta izumitelja Polža.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(4.74+0+11.11+17.65+0)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
