Article "Grafkelder van Oranje-Nassau" in Dutch Wikipedia has 53.1 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 22 references and 14 sections.
In October 2023 the article "Grafkelder van Oranje-Nassau" was edited by 1 authors in Dutch Wikipedia and written by 1 authors in all languages.
Since the creation of article "Grafkelder van Oranje-Nassau", its content was written by 130 registered users of Dutch Wikipedia (5994th place) and edited by 130 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 72 times in Dutch Wikipedia and cited 72 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Dutch: #52 08.2013 |
Global: #77187 08.2013 |
On 14 April 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Iran, Bayer 04 Leverkusen, Israel, Fallout, Iron Dome, Xabi Alonso, Max Holloway, Fallout, YouTube, Bundesliga.
In Dutch Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Iran, Bayer 04 Leverkusen, Abdi Nageeye, Amstel Gold Race, Lee Towers, IJzeren Koepel, Israël, Marianne Vos, Leverkusen, XXXX.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(58.34+38.6+47.06+60.87+60.72)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
