An Audience at Agrippa's - painting by Laurentius Alma-Tadema. Article "Admissio apud Agrippam" in Latin Wikipedia has 5.7 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023).
Since the creation of article "Admissio apud Agrippam", its content was written by 2 registered users of Latin Wikipedia and edited by 2 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
An Audience at Agrippa's is on the 69th place in local ranking of paintings on Latin Wikipedia in all the time.
The article is cited 5 times in Latin Wikipedia and cited 5 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Latin: #10008 08.2011 |
Global: #6040107 08.2011 |
On 14 April 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Iran, Bayer 04 Leverkusen, Israel, Fallout, Iron Dome, Xabi Alonso, Max Holloway, Fallout, YouTube, Bundesliga.
In Latin Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Carolus Puigdemont, IPv6, Secundum bellum mundanum, Lingua Latina, Vicipaedia, Civitates Foederatae Americae, Villarica Spiritus Sancti, Genshin Impact, Masturbatio, Lex quadratica inversa.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(3.34+0+25+0+0)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
