This person is the 440th most popular in Galician Wikipedia. Article "Antía Otero" in Galician Wikipedia has 38 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 23 references and 12 sections.
Since the creation of article "Antía Otero", its content was written by 15 registered users of Galician Wikipedia and edited by 15 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
Antía Otero is on the 440th place in local ranking of people on Galician Wikipedia in all the time.
The article is cited 19 times in Galician Wikipedia and cited 19 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Galician: #259 05.2019 |
Global: #2584520 05.2019 |
On 14 April 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Iran, Bayer 04 Leverkusen, Israel, Fallout, Iron Dome, Xabi Alonso, Max Holloway, Fallout, YouTube, Bundesliga.
In Galician Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: José López Campos, María Martínez Allegue, Carles Puigdemont, Javi Maneiro, Distritos de Portugal, Bayer Leverkusen, Segunda República Española, AWStats, José González Vázquez, Roko (actriz).
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(13.31+12.64+13.33+60+90.68)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
