Article "Маці Божая Лагішынская" in Belarusian Wikipedia has 10.3 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 2 references and 4 sections.
Since the creation of article "Маці Божая Лагішынская", its content was written by 6 registered users of Belarusian Wikipedia and edited by 6 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
Маці Божая Лагішынская is on the 33rd place in local ranking of paintings on Belarusian Wikipedia in all the time.
The article is cited 20 times in Belarusian Wikipedia and cited 20 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Belarusian: #1818 06.2015 |
Global: #3497633 06.2015 |
On 14 April 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Iran, Bayer 04 Leverkusen, Israel, Fallout, Iron Dome, Xabi Alonso, Max Holloway, Fallout, YouTube, Bundesliga.
In Belarusian Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Карлес Пучдэмон, Міхась Пазнякоў, Беларусь, Ірана-ізраільскі канфлікт (2024), AP$ENT, Уладзімір Караткевіч, Раіса Андрэеўна Баравікова, Прыметнік, Васіль Быкаў, УННВ.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(3.61+0.95+5.26+16+25.52)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
