Article "المصباح المنير" in Arabic Wikipedia has 0.8 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.
Since the creation of article "المصباح المنير", its content was written by 17 registered users of Arabic Wikipedia and edited by 17 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
Al-Misbah Al-Munir is on the 898th place in local ranking of books on Arabic Wikipedia in all the time.
The article is cited 66 times in Arabic Wikipedia and cited 66 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Arabic: #14925 01.2008 |
Global: #1365005 11.2020 |
| Best Rank | Arabic: #3187 11.2005 |
Global: #375618 11.2005 |
On 23 April 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: YouTube, Serie A, Shōgun, Fallout, Facebook, Fallout, Saint George, Saint George Day, Inter Milan, ChatGPT.
In Arabic Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: نادي الهلال (السعودية), عبد المجيد الزنداني, نادي أرسنال, دوري أبطال آسيا, الدوري الإنجليزي الممتاز, نادي العين, ريال مدريد, سكسي سكسي لافر, متلازمة XXXX, مانشستر سيتي.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(0.88+0+0+3.45+0)-0.04$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
