Article "الجمعية الثقافية الجاحظية" in Arabic Wikipedia has 1.6 points for quality (as of June 1, 2023). The article contains 0 references and 2 sections. The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.
Since the creation of article "الجمعية الثقافية الجاحظية", its content was written by 12 registered users of Arabic Wikipedia and edited by 12 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 132 times in Arabic Wikipedia and cited 132 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipedia dumps from June 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Arabic: #19752 11.2008 |
Global: #2128534 11.2008 |
| Best Rank | Arabic: #1135 11.2005 |
Global: #226316 11.2005 |
On 16 September 2023 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: YouTube, Facebook, Hugh Jackman, deaths in 2023, Oppenheimer, Al-Nassr, A Haunting in Venice, Rosh Hashanah, 2023 Rugby World Cup, One Piece.
In Arabic Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: نادي برشلونة, نادي النصر (السعودية), مانشستر سيتي, اليوم الوطني للمملكة العربية السعودية, يوتيوب, المولد النبوي, صلاة الفجر, آية الكرسي, صلاة الاستخارة, ديربي ميلانو.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 42 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from June, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from May 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(1.54+0+0+6.9+0)-0.08$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
